🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage could be the perfect selection for a daring scary movie focused on Jesus Christ, though not for the reasons certain viewers could guess. Actually, Cage doesn't even portray the central religious figure in the new film: the part he plays is credited only as The Carpenter. Cage is cast as the Joseph within this narrative, attempting to uphold his faith while The Boy (played by Noah Jupe), their adolescent adopted son, commences to show miraculous gifts. The reason it’s difficult to picture any other leading star playing this part is that while the figure becomes weighed down with numerous challenges, Cage himself looks almost emotionally certain that this gloomy, somber small film is a valuable project.

Cage's Latest Film Selections

Cage has spending that time more judiciously in recent years. He continues to makes more films than most regular audiences may ever watch — as an illustration, did you know that he has filmed several distinct frontier films recently? — yet he also mixes in esteemed critically acclaimed roles such as Dream Scenario, Pig, and Longlegs. The Carpenter’s Son appears to be one of those, as it’s genre-adjacent, likely to stir debate, and takes a over-the-top concept in a earnest manner.

Movie's Plot and Execution

Sadly, writer-director Lotfy Nathan does not justify viewer engagement. The film opens in a compellingly nomadic place, presented as drawing from an unknown scripture concerning Christ’s childhood. Cage's character, the maternal figure, and their son travel frequently, afraid of doctrinal intolerance or doubt regarding their son's strange powers. “Calamity follows us,” The Carpenter sadly observes. It goes on as evil influences focus on the family in their latest settlement, beginning on the traditional religious challenge for the youth.

Occasionally, the movie mirrors an demonic possession-type supernatural thriller, except that no one of the main figures are clearly inhabited. Instead, they grow progressively isolated from each other, when these entities infect a resident female (the actress, listed as an outsider) that The Boy forms a relationship with, and provides each character troubling visions of a bleak destiny. Cage's role especially grapples with his position in the narrative, occasionally berating the son he can’t fully understand.

Discussion and Caution

The subject matter is apt to invite debate, and Nathan approaches it with plenty of sensitivity — overly, perhaps. The concept of a teenage boy facing his future martyrdom and tempted by unknown powers is certainly scary, but the filmmaker might be hesitant regarding seeming gratuitous and eager to signal his aims, thus he frequently withdraws to gloomily threatening cinematography. Characters constantly ponder — the singer-actress, who displayed notable talent in a recent film update, interestingly — surrenders her acting to her religious attire, at times punctuated by several disturbing frightening scenes.

Cage's Performance and Movie's Weaknesses

Meanwhile, the actor toy with exactly the kind of exaggerated performance that his ironic fans could be expecting. One scene (also included) in promotional material in which Cage erupts and yells “I’ve lost my faith!” If that kind of florid outburst is included in a religious scary film, possibly a more boldly ridiculous approach would make better use of Cage’s willingness to be extreme when necessary. Instead, The Carpenter’s Son more closely resembles the less successful direct-to-video films the actor filmed during the 2010s — not the cheesy thrillers but rather the serious stories and ghost stories that often seem intriguing, and usually have a few choice actor's highlights, but finally come across like, indeed, cheap home video fare.

Honestly, several of these, although simpler, were easier to view in general. This is when I need to break my usual practice, not spiritual but professional: Years back, an admired senior urged me to banish words like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my analytical lexicon. These words express scant but a personal and broadly stated lack of patience, withdrawing from the job of clearly expressing the intellectual and feeling of seeing an individual production. It's hard to convey tedium without appearing dull oneself. It’s no more expressive as labeling a movie “interesting.” “Explain further,” in other words.

Yet, I acknowledge, I was bored during much of the film. In its defense, it is a devotional type of dullness, not due to The Carpenter’s Son is preachy, but because it requires a sort of dutiful submission to view it. At some point soon after starting, this feature enters a monotonous pattern of ongoing suffering, and fails to