I'm a Hardcore Free-Market Advocate, Yet Medicare for All Represents the Best Hope for US Healthcare

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I know dozens of businesses who are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would still be a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.

James Palmer
James Palmer

A tech journalist and digital strategist with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and their societal impacts.